Saturday, October 13, 2012

Bring On November 7

 

Election 10-13-12   Image courtesy of nirots at FreeDigitalPhotos.net

I know, I know.  I keep insisting that I’m not a political person, and then I keep talking about the election.  But only because it keeps invading my television screen day in and day out; you just can’t avoid it, even when you wish you could.

Take last night, for instance.  It’s bad enough that the VP debate kept me from seeing Grey’s Anatomy, Elementary, and Person of Interest.  But, I was at school, so I didn’t even get to see most of the debate live.  I have recorded it, but, honestly, after 24 hours of analysis, reporting, scorekeeping, Facebook posting, and just all around griping about who did what to whom, I’m not sure I can bring myself to sit through it at this point. 

Somehow, I think we’ve lost sight of what should be important in our political processes, and—much as I hate to say it—I think my beloved television is a large part of why.  It’s no longer enough to let the candidates sink or swim on their merits (if that’s the right word), but now we have to talk about their attitude, how they came across to the camera, their common courtesy, and—the one I will never understand—whether or not someone in Iowa thought they were nice.  Honestly, no disrespect to Iowans, but their opinions on the basic decency of a particular candidate is pretty low on my priority list.

Of course the presidential election is important; it’s going to determine to a very great extent how we live for at least the next four years, maybe forever.  And of course we need television coverage of the election, and I do believe debates should be televised.  Maybe they even need a little bit of a breakdown analysis immediately afterward.  Maybe.  I think if someone sat and watched the thing for an hour and a half, they should know what was said, but it might still provide some benefit.  But after that?  Oh my gosh, just let it go, already. 


31 Days of TV

Comments (6)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
I admit to being mildly amused by the debates, and this whole election. And I am especially amused by the supporters of the candidates. I was in the washroom at work the other day and two women were in there oohing and ahhing over how "good-looking" Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan are...and how they hoped they would win the election based on their looks alone.

That...wasn't so amusing to me. I dislike the idea that people are voting for looks rather than platforms and records. *shrugs*

At any rate, I am going to be glad when this election is over. The only two candidates who have any chance of winning do not interest me.
My recent post Shameless Self-Promotion Is a Good Thing!
1 reply · active 650 weeks ago
Yes, it is sort of scary the decision making processes some folks employ. I'm not a particularly political person, so I have to admit that a lot of the local offices I don't pay any attention to so can't make anything resembling an informed decision. Consequently, I don't cast a vote for those folks, and I still remember when my husband and I first got together, I had to call the election board to prove to him that was okay, because he thought I was invalidating my entire ballot by doing that.
Here's the thing about Grey's Anatomy - they only do 22 episodes of it anyway, so even when they rerun each one, that's only 44 out of 52 weeks. Preemption, I say, is a good thing, especially when you only watch TV on DVR and your wife both records Dancing with the Stars then doesn't get around to watching it; what a machine hog that show is!
My recent post Who starred with whom, and where?
1 reply · active 650 weeks ago
I suppose that's looking on the bright side of things, though I have never been a fan of preemption. In fact, it's one of the main reasons I hate when the Olympics roll around; I don't particularly care for sports and it completely jacks up all the other programming!
I keep asking myself why on earth people put so much stock in how a candidate appears over the course of an hour or two of grilling on t.v. versus what the guy stands for and what policies he is likely to try to bring into government. He could be the most suave, well-spoken person in the world, but if his agenda is to promote policy with which I disagree, I wouldn't be voting for him! The debates have taken on too much importance, in my opinion.
1 reply · active 650 weeks ago
I can certainly understand that perspective, as well. But I do think the Q&A format gives us an opportunity to see a different type of skill from the candidates, and try to determine if they seem to be people who can think under pressure and form a coherent thought. Not that they aren't well-rehearsed for the topics at hand so much of the exchange still sounds like just another campaign stop, but I like it when they are caught at least a bit off-guard.

Post a new comment

Comments by